facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog external search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
Midterm Elections: What Do They Mean for Markets? Thumbnail

Midterm Elections: What Do They Mean for Markets?

Investment

It’s almost Election Day in the U.S. once again. For those who need a brief civics refresher, every two years the full US House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate are up for reelection. 

While the outcomes of the elections are uncertain, one thing we can count on is that plenty of opinions and prognostications will be floated in the days to come. In financial circles, this will almost assuredly include any potential for perceived impact on markets. But should long-term investors focus on midterm elections?

Markets Work

We would caution investors against making short-term changes to a long-term plan to try to profit or avoid losses from changes in the political winds. For context, it is helpful to think of markets as a powerful information-processing machine. The combined impact of millions of investors placing billions of dollars’ worth of trades each day results in market prices that incorporate the aggregate expectations of those investors. This makes outguessing market prices consistently very difficult.[1] While surprises can and do happen in elections, the surprises don’t always lead to clear-cut outcomes for investors.

The 2016 presidential election serves as a recent example of this. There were a variety of opinions about how the election would impact markets, but many articles at the time posited that stocks would fall if Trump were elected.[2] The day following President Trump’s win, however, the S&P 500 Index closed 1.1% higher. So even if an investor would have correctly predicted the election outcome (which was not apparent in pre-election polling), there is no guarantee that they would have predicted the correct directional move, especially given the narrative at the time.

But what about congressional elections? For the upcoming midterms, market strategists and news outlets are still likely to offer opinions on who will win and what impact it will have on markets. However, data for the stock market going back to 1926 shows that returns in months when midterm elections took place did not tend to be that different from returns in any other month.

Exhibit 1 shows the frequency of monthly returns (expressed in 1% increments) for the S&P 500 Index from January 1926–August 2018. Each horizontal dash represents one month, and each vertical bar shows the cumulative number of months for which returns were within a given 1% range (e.g., the tallest bar shows all months where returns were between 1% and 2%). The blue and red horizontal lines represent months during which a midterm election was held, with red meaning Republicans won or maintained majorities in both chambers of Congress, and blue representing the same for Democrats. Striped boxes indicate mixed control, where one party controls the House of Representatives, and the other controls the Senate, while gray boxes represent non-election months. This graphic illustrates that election month returns were well within the typical range of returns, regardless of which party won the election. Results similarly appeared random when looking at all Congressional elections (midterm and presidential) and for annual returns (both the year of the election and the year after).

Exhibit 1.       Midterm Elections and S&P 500 Index Returns, Histogram of Monthly Returns January 1926–August 2018

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS. INDICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR DIRECT INVESTMENT; THEREFORE, THEIR PERFORMANCE DOES NOT REFLECT THE EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE MANAGEMENT OF AN ACTUAL PORTFOLIO. S&P DATA © 2018 S&P DOW JONES INDICES LLC, A DIVISION OF S&P GLOBAL. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

In It For The Long Haul

While it can be easy to get distracted by month-to-month or even one-year returns, what really matters for long-term investors is how their wealth grows over longer periods of time. Exhibit 2 shows the hypothetical growth of wealth for an investor who put $1 in the S&P 500 Index in January 1926. Again, the chart lays out party control of Congress over time. And again, both parties have periods of significant growth and significant declines during their time of majority rule. However, there does not appear to be a pattern of stronger returns when any specific party is in control of Congress, or when there is mixed control for that matter. Markets have historically continued to provide returns over the long run irrespective of (and perhaps for those who are tired of hearing political ads, even in spite of) which party is in power at any given time.

Exhibit 2.       Hypothetical Growth of $1 Invested in the S&P 500 Index and Party Control of Congress January 1926–August 2018

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS. INDICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR DIRECT INVESTMENT; THEREFORE, THEIR PERFORMANCE DOES NOT REFLECT THE EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE MANAGEMENT OF AN ACTUAL PORTFOLIO. S&P DATA © 2018 S&P DOW JONES INDICES LLC, A DIVISION OF S&P GLOBAL. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Equity markets can help investors grow their assets, and we believe investing is a long-term endeavor. Trying to make investment decisions based on the outcome of elections is unlikely to result in reliable excess returns for investors. At best, any positive outcome based on such a strategy will likely be the result of random luck. At worst, it can lead to costly mistakes. Accordingly, there is a strong case for investors to rely on patience and portfolio structure, rather than trying to outguess the market, to pursue investment returns.

[1]. This is known as the efficient market theory, which postulates that market prices reflect the knowledge and expectations of all investors and that any new development is instantaneously priced into a security.

[2]. Examples include: “A Trump win would sink stocks. What about Clinton?” CNN Money, 10/4/16, “What do financial markets think of the 2016 election?” Brookings Institution, 10/21/16, “What Happens to the Markets if Donald Trump Wins?” New York Times, 10/31/16.

DISCLAIMER:

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS BELIEVED TO BE FACTUAL AND UP-TO-DATE, BUT WE DO NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY AND IT SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE SUBJECTS DISCUSSED. ALL EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION REFLECT THE JUDGMENT OF THE AUTHOR ON THE DATE OF PUBLICATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES AND SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED AS PERSONALIZED INVESTMENT ADVICE OR AS AN OFFER TO BUY OR SELL THE SECURITIES MENTIONED. A PROFESSIONAL ADVISOR SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE STRATEGIES PRESENTED.

HYPERLINKS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE AND WE DISCLAIM ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFORMATION, SERVICES OR PRODUCTS FOUND ON WEBSITES LINKED HERETO. ANY LINKS TO THIRD PARTY WEBSITES ARE OFFERED ONLY FOR USE AT YOUR OWN DISCRETION.

TOBIN INVESTMENT PLANNING LLC IS REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR AND ONLY TRANSACTS BUSINESS IN STATES WHERE IT IS PROPERLY REGISTERED, OR IS EXCLUDED OR EXEMPTED FROM REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS. REGISTRATION AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ENDORSEMENT OF THE FIRM BY SECURITIES REGULATORS NOR DOES IT INDICATE THAT THE ADVISER HAS ATTAINED A PARTICULAR LEVEL OF SKILL OR ABILITY. THE FIRM IS NOT ENGAGED IN THE PRACTICE OF LAW OR ACCOUNTING.

 ALL INVESTMENT STRATEGIES HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR PROFIT OR LOSS. DIVERSIFICATION DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE RISK OF MARKET LOSS. DIFFERENT TYPES OF INVESTMENTS INVOLVE VARYING DEGREES OF RISK, AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY SPECIFIC INVESTMENT OR STRATEGY WILL BE SUITABLE OR PROFITABLE FOR A CLIENT’S PORTFOLIO. THERE ARE NO ASSURANCES THAT A PORTFOLIO WILL MATCH OR OUTPERFORM ANY PARTICULAR BENCHMARK. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT AN INDICATOR OF FUTURE RESULTS.